England's school examinations regulator said it had made a mistake
England's school examinations regulator said it had
made a mistake with the way it awarded grades to school students in England
after their exams were cancelled due to Covid-19, and the grades would now be
based on teachers' assessments instead.
Roger Taylor, chair of
the Ofqual exam board regulator, said the body had taken “the wrong road” and
had to change course as he offered an apology to students and to schools.
The government has faced
days of criticism after Ofqual used an algorithm to assess grade predictions
made by teachers, and lowered those grades for almost 40 per cent of students
taking their main school-leaving exams.
Media reports had earlier
suggested the British government was working with regulators on how to resolve
the escalating row.
A spokesman for Prime Minister Boris Johnson said the
government was continuing to work on a solution, and that Johnson had spoken
with education minister Gavin Williamson and other officials on Monday morning
from his holiday in Scotland.
“The whole of government
has been, and continues to work hard to come up with the fairest system
possible for pupils,” the spokesman said.
Results for separate
exams taken by mostly 15- and 16-year-old students are due to be announced on
Thursday, and were due to be subject to the same regulator moderation.
The row had damaged
Johnson's core message to voters since he was elected in December, which was
that he wanted to get rid of barriers to achievement and help those from poorer
backgrounds and areas achieve their potential.
Anecdotal evidence from
students shows some were downgraded several levels by the regulator's model and
missed out on university places.
The devolved government
in Wales announced on Monday it would use teachers' predictions for all exam
results, and Northern Ireland's assembly said Thursday's results for 15- and
16-year-olds would be based on teachers' assessments.
Analysis of the Ofqual
algorithm showed it to result in “manifest injustice”, said Paul Johnson,
director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think-tank, writing for the newspaper.
He said it favoured
students in the smaller classes more commonly found at fee-paying schools, and,
by basing its predictions on past performance, made it harder for top pupils at
historically poor-performing schools to get the best grades.
Comments
Post a Comment